.
Annunci online

 
lapsus 
lapsus psicologia e polis
<%if foto<>"0" then%>
Torna alla home page di questo Blog
 
  Ultime cose
Il mio profilo
  Feed RSS di questo blog Rss 2.0
Feed ATOM di questo blog Atom
  EMERGENZE
Blog Trotter Monitor
Jerushalayim
Ajeeb
Iraki News Agency
Ha'aretz
PRAVDA forum
World Press Photo
English Dar Alhayat
Uri Avnery's News Pages
Paix Maintenant
Peace Now
Peace Now Israel
Palestine Chronicle
Shalom.it
Nonviolenti.org
Sigmund Freud e Albert Einstein
COPING WITH TERRORISM
The Phenomenology of Trauma and the Absolutisms of Everyday Life
Federal Emergency Management Agency
alzataconpugno
straripando
babi119
esperimento
barnaba
ricordiamocene
miele98
CounterPunch
olifante
stilgar
mises
controcorrente
marioadinolfi
maquiavel
arsenico
calimero
oiraid
nanamalefika
liberopensiero
celeste
notimenospace
shockandawe
sannita
prospettiva_cdv
titollo
panther
cassandra
leguerrecivili
bartleby
mipassaperlatesta.
più che puoi
napoorsocapo
yadoge
  cerca



 

Diario | Psicologia e Guerra | Altrove | Chi è chi | Politichese | Intrighi | Serendipity | Europa | Sviluppo (in)sostenibile | Biotecnologie |
 
Diario
1visite.

13 maggio 2004

Vero? Falso? Arte-fatto ? Nicholas Berg's Murder: The Unanswered Questions

Si continua a sorvolare sul fatto che quello che i media ci propinano (foto, video) sia 'montato' (all'origine e tecnicamente) si continuano a leggere e sentire commenti come se di FATTI si stesse parlando, mentre nessuno pare in grado nemmeno più di controllare cosa è autentico e cosa no >>> 1. Bloggers doubt Berg execution video By Lawrence Smallman Thursday 13 May 2004, 17:18 Makka Time, 14:18 GMT Was this really Nick Berg's last moment or was he killed earlier? Revolting millions around the world, the video footage of an American citizen's execution has also raised numerous questions concerning its authenticity. Even at first glance, internet bloggers were asking on Thursday why Nick Berg was wearing an orange jumpsuit – just like US prisoners wear. Other net-surfers point to the unlikely timing of the executioner's dubbed announcement that Berg was to die for "Iraqi prisoner abuse". Berg was last seen alive on 10 April, when his father Michael Berg believes he was killed - two weeks before the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal broke in the world's media. Some discussions focus on the timing of the video's release - guaranteed to divert attention from the outrage regarding US torture of Iraqis. >>> 2. Friend: Berg said he was in U.S. custody Thursday, May 13, 2004 Posted: 10:40 AM EDT (1440 GMT) BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Slain American Nicholas Berg told a friend that he had been arrested by Iraqi police, detained briefly, and then handed over to U.S. troops who held him in a coalition facility for almost two weeks, the friend said. Chilean freelance journalist Hugo Infante told CNN that weeks before the videotape of Berg's grisly death emerged on the Internet, "Nick told me, 'Iraqi police caught me one night, they saw my passport and my Jewish last name and my Israeli stamp. This guy thought I was a spy so they put me with American soldiers and American soldiers put me in a jail for two weeks.'" ... "I still hold (Rumsfeld) responsible because if they had let him go after a more reasonable amount of time or if they had given him access to lawyers we could have gotten him out of there before the hostilities escalated," the father told Boston's WBUR radio station. "That's really what cost my son his life was the fact that the U.S. government saw fit to keep him in custody for 13 days without any of his due process or civil rights." ... The next he heard of Berg was when he heard news of his death. "I thought he was back in the States. And I thought, my God, this is the guy. A different guy. More skinny, more pallid," Infante said. >>> 3. Nicholas Berg's Murder: The Unanswered Questions May 13, 2004, Iraq The savage murder and decapitation of 26-year-old Nicholas Berg in Iraq has been rightly condemned by observers around the world, Muslim and non-Muslim. There is a strong possibility that this killing was committed by an Islamist organization--there are certainly many Muslims willing to lend the name of Islam to their criminal machinations, and that number continues to grow every day with each war crime committed by the leaders of the Anglo-American occupation force in Iraq. However, there are many unanswered questions. Although much of this is being reported through disparate dispatches in the corporate media, few have bothered to put it all together lest they be accused of fomenting a dreaded conspiracy theory. But since, as we've previously pointed out, the Bush Administration has made a business of fanning its own "with us or with the terrorists" conspiracies, it might be worth testing their reasoning and wondering, if it's not the terrorists who may have killed Nick Berg, then who else could it have been? Here's a preliminary list of questions. 1. Will the real Abu Musab al-Zarqawi please stand up. I couldn't help but wonder why the notorious Al-Zarqawi, the supposed one-legged Jordanian Al Qaeda mastermind, was simultaneously proudly identifying himself as the perpetrator of the atrocity, and hiding himself by wearing a hood. What gives? In fact, since February of last year, when Colin Powell suggested Al-Zarqawi was Saddam's link with Al Qaeda in his infamous presentation to the UN Security Council, it seems that Al-Zarqawi's reputation was more a result of it being manufactured by Bush administration officials than any reality. Al-Zarqawi turned up again when the US military released a letter he allegedly authored earlier this year. Now he's back on the decapitation video. 2. The official Al Qaeda Website: click to see advertising rates. The video was suddenly discovered on the Ansar al-Islam website, a reportedly Al-Qaeda-connected website that was being hosted by a Malaysian company. Now, after the years of close cooperation between US intelligence and Malaysian authorities in the "War on Terror," how was this website allowed to operate in the first place? 3. Berg's mysterious disappearance. Then there is the issue of Nick Berg's mysterious detention by authorities in Iraq shortly before being captured by "Al Qaeda." Berg's family had been working unsuccessfully to gain his release from what they believed was US custody. On April 5th, the family filed suit in federal court claiming that their son was being held illegally by the US military. He was released on April 6th. Berg then told his family that he was held by US authorities for 13 days. But the US military denied any of this, claiming that he was detained by Iraqi police in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. Coalition spokesman Dan Senor said yesterday that "he [Berg] was at no time under the jurisdiction or detention of coalition forces." But Major General Mohammed Khair al-Barhawi, Iraqi police chief in Mosul, denies that categorically: The Iraqi police never arrested the slain American. Take it from me ... that such reports are baseless. Will Nick Berg's family ever get some answers from our government? We're waiting, along with the September 11th families. >>> 4. Mosul police chief denies detaining slain American By Scheherezade Faramarzi, Associated Press, 5/13/2004 11:06 BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) An American who was beheaded by militants had told friends he was arrested by Iraqi police in Mosul because he had an Israeli stamp in his passport. The Mosul police chief Thursday denied having arrested him. >>> 5. Berg's Father and Firm Were On A Right-Wing 'Enemies' List The family firm of beheaded American Nick Berg, was named by a conservative website in a list of 'enemies' of the Iraq occupation. That could explain his arrest by Iraqi police --a detention which fatally delayed his planned return from Iraq and may have led directly to his death. Nick Berg, 26 disappeared into incommunicado detention after his arrest by Iraqi police in March, 2004. He vanished again after his release 13 days later. His body was found last Saturday in Baghdad, and a video of his beheading --supposedly by a radical Islamic group-- was posted on the Internet on Tuesday. The official story of his gruesome murder has many dubious aspects, not least the real reason why Iraqi police detained the young man at a checkpoint. New research by BreakForNews has uncovered a plausible explanation. The FreeRepublic.com web site and forum has a reputation for right-wing views, fanatical Republicanism and relentless pro-war activism. On 7th March, 2004, just three weeks before the first anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, an 'enemies' list of anti-war groups and individuals was posted on the Free Republic forum. It began: "Here you are, FReepers. Here is the enemy." The list had been copied from publicly available endorsements of a call to action for an imminent anniversary antiwar protest on 20th March, 2004. The protest was being organized under the banner of the A.N.S.W.E.R Coalition (Act Now to Stop War & End Racism). Among those listed as having endorsed the call to action was this entry: "Michael S. Berg, Teacher, Prometheus Methods Tower Service, Inc." That's Nick Berg's father, Michael who acts as business manager for his son in their family radio communications firm, Prometheus Methods Tower Service. Both father and son cared deeply about Iraq. But they were on opposite sides of opinion on the occupation --though you would never know that from reading the New York Times. Michael was ardently antiwar, whereas his Bush-supporting son was in favor of the war to the extent that he had already visited Iraq seeking to help with rebuilding efforts. Just seven days after "Michael Berg" and "Prometheus Methods Tower Service" had come up on that Iraq war 'enemies' list, his son Nick Berg returned to Iraq under the business name of Prometheus Methods Tower Service. The scene was set for tragically mistaken suspicions --which were to end in the horrifying death of an honorable and blameless American. A humanitarian who had traveled several times to Third World countries --such as Ghana, to teach villagers construction techniques. The web traffic to the Free Republic forum --and it's forum membership-- include significant numbers of serving and former US military. Many members take their online activism very seriously. Some delight in causing mischief for those they think are identified as "enemies." Within minutes of getting their hands on the antiwar names, one was boasting of having contacted the military about active service personnel who were on the list: "I forwarded the list to the ISC (the command you listed), the district officer... the district legal office and the investigative services office." The response: "The poor moron is not going to know what hit him. Is this being mean-spirited? NO! Someone against our military does not belong in the military!" Another was already investigating a member of the Coast Guard on the list: "I took a look at his yahoo and he has a site which is not real fond of the war on drugs OR the war on terrorism.... That particular coastie needs some serious trouble to come his way...." " I spoke on the phone to a senior chief yesterday in Virginia.... [who] could not believe what the guy was doing. He was both astounded and angry. I think [he] is in for some big, big trouble." If that list could end up on an Internet forum, then it could just as readily end up with the FBI, and eventually in the hands of those in Iraq who are keen to track or harass antiwar activists entering the country. Alternatively, the enthusiasts on Free Republic have the contacts and the clear determination to have ensured the list quickly got to the right places. At the time the list was posted, Nick Berg had just come back from an Iraq trip lasting from late December to Feb. 1. He had reported no problems whatsoever with Iraqi police during that visit. Yet, within two weeks of the list being posted, Nick Berg --back in Iraq on his final fatal trip-- was reportedly detained in Mosul at an Iraqi police checkpoint. The official explanation is that authorities thought his identification might have been forged and were checking his authenticity. But a more likely reason is that by then authorities in Iraq had discovered that a 'Berg' of Prometheus Methods Tower Service was in the country, and issued a detention instruction to Iraqi police because they misidentified Nick Berg as an antiwar activist entering Iraq to work for the 'enemy'. That could explain why he was held incommunicado for 13 days, without recourse to a lawyer; why US officialdom was singularly unheeding of his mother's pleas; why the FBI visited his family to question them; why it took a US court order secured by the family to pressure his release. And why he was cruelly murdered soon after that release, like many others around the world who suffer such a fate at the hands of state-condoned death squads --sometimes just hours after their release from official detention. That's the final sordid twist in this grisly story. If the world was an uncomplicated place, then this tale would end with the mistaken arrest of Nick Berg. We could finish by noting that Nick's father is reportedly accusing the US government of contributing to his son's death. Unable to find work in Iraq, Nick Berg's last trip was set to be a short one. He planned to return to the US on the 30th of March. Michael Berg charges that his son's detention until 5th April, was a violation of civil rights which fatally delayed his exit from Iraq and instead left him dangerously stranded in the middle of the explosion of violence which erupted in early April, 2004. But there are much graver aspects to all this. Another chilling perspective is best summarized by the wry cynicism of Michael Rivero at WhatReallyHappened.com In a commentary on the beheading of Nick Berg, Rivero writes: "How wonderfully lucky for Bush and the NeoCons that such a great piece of pro-war distract-from-the-torture-scandal event happens at this particular moment." Rivero's world-weary realism strikes a chord with his popular website's visitors, but will undoubtedly shock unseasoned observers. However he is far from alone in questioning the official line. Others have noted the too-white hands and military at-ease stance of the hooded captors in the video. The killing has certainly eased the international discomfiture of the US. The problem with assumptions that al-Queda is responsible for Berg's beheading, is that Musab al-Zarqawi is mentioned in a caption on the videotape of the killing. Al-Zarqawi came to our attention in January, 2004 when the US military claimed to have intercepted a letter of his written to the al-Queda leadership. But the content of the letter read like a US military propaganda statement on the situation in Iraq. In the letter al-Zarqawi wrote of Iraqis coming to welcome the US presence in Iraq, and about how al-Queda was loosing ground in it's war against the US. In February, 2004 an article "The Zarqawi Gambit," by Greg Weiher on Counterpunch was deeply skeptical of the letter: "..if you were Karl Rove, you couldn't design a better scenario to validate the administration's slant on the war than this. That's a good reason to maintain a healthy skepticism. In fact, there are a number of good reasons to take this story with a grain of salt (maybe a three- or four-pounder)." The US has been keen to paint the opposition to the occupation as composed of many foreign fighters tied to al-Queda. The letter was clearly fabricated for propaganda purposes, with al-Zarqawi as it's new al-Queda star. But if al-Zarqawi is merely a flimsy propaganda creation, then what confidence can we have in the official line that al-Zarqawi and al-Queda murdered Berg. The only plausible alternative is a covert, black operation orchestrated as part of the seedier arm of US foreign policy --which generally only come to light when candid photographs, for example, reach the public domain. But that's an explanation which many would reject on the grounds that no force allied to the US --no matter how black its operations-- would have members so callous as to even countenance the cold-blooded beheading of a US citizen. However, there is a mindset amplified by war passions and found among the gung-ho brutes who beat Iraqis to death; found among the thuggish mercenary death squads who roam to slay at will; and found among the cold-blooded sociopaths who have planted bombs for political strategic reasons. It's war. And war begets a wartime mindset. Nick Berg's detention indicates that authorities regarded him an an antiwar activist and possibly also as an 'enemy.' That original post on Free Republic contains a telling indication of a mindset, which in the heat of war could well kill an American it regards as the "enemy." A mindset which has now reacted to Michael Berg's loss of his son like this: "I wonder what he thinks about his Muslim buddies now... " A mindset displayed by the search keywords used on Free Republic to categorize the list of antiwar supporters. The keywords are: APPEASENIKS; DAMNCOMMIES; ENEMYWITHIN; LEFTISTS; PEACENIKS; RATS; SCUMBAGS; TRAITORS; TREASONOUSSCUM; USEFULIDIOTS; WARONTERROR




permalink | inviato da il 13/5/2004 alle 21:34 | Leggi i commenti e commenta questo postcommenti (0) | Versione per la stampa
sfoglia
aprile        giugno